Excerpt from The English Reports, Vol. 144: Common Pleas XXII, Containing Common Bench Reports (New Series), Vols. 17 to 20Williams, J I am entirely of the same opinion. At the trial the question was treated by the plaintiff's counsel as one of law: and I dealt with it accordingly. I entirely agree with my Lord in the conclusion he has come to, and also in the reasons he has given. An [37] attempt was made on the part of the plaintiff to give evidence of a custom peculiar to huntsmen, assuming a huntsman to fall within the class of menial servants. But I told the jury I could discover no evidence upon which they could properly find such a custom. The utmost the evidence for the plaintiff amounted to, was the story of the individual experiences of his Witnesses. There was nothing which could be considered as a legal foundation for any such custom. The real question to be decided was, whether the hiring of a huntsman was determinable at a month's notice. After maturely considering all the evidence that was given, I have come to the conclusion that the ease of the huntsman must be governed by the general rule applicable to all other domestic servants.About the PublisherForgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.comThis book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully, any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.